Who will benefit from an attack on Syria?

     Let me see if I get this right:
     Syrian President Assad allegedly uses chemical weapons against his own people, KNOWING he would make Syria a pariah in the eyes of the world.
     Is it me, or does that sound like rather stupid/suicidal behavior from a maniac desperate to maintain power and stay alive?
     Meanwhile, the Washington Post is reporting the VICTIMS of the chemical weapons attack say the attack came from the REBELS. (You know, those wonderful misunderstood friendly Muslims with links to Al Qaida.)
      WHY would the REBELS do this?
     Because they are NOT going to win. Syria's army is too big, too well-trained (for an Arab army) and even with foreign aid and weapons coming to them, they cannot win, especially with Russia and China backing Syria.
     Their only hope is to get the United States to bomb the crap out of Assad (in the name of 'retaliation') in the hopes of weakening his regime so they can take over and impose a Sharia-based Muslim government.
     NATURALLY, this "attack" will "not be to destroy the infrastructure of Syria" but to retaliate/punish Assad for use of chemical weapons (while conveniently helping the rebels).
     We bomb Syria. That is an act of war.
     By rights, Syria could LEGALLY declare war on the US and here comes the next wave of terrorists. (Realistically, the Syrians CANNOT sustain an invasion/attack against the USA, but they can make life hell.)Supporting the rebels is an act of war (depending on if Russia and China want to make a big deal out of it).
     And what do we get for supporting the rebels? They're not going to renounce their ties to Al Qaida, they're not going to love the United States. They're not going to do anything in return. Maybe once they take over Syria, they might consider attacking Israel, but that's about it.
     It's a lose-lose proposition.
     But tie this into the next upcoming bitch-slap for Il Douche.
     The March on DC.
     I think Obama is scared shitless at the thought of being in DC that week. Last count I saw at the Patriots' Guild FB page had up to 3 million unarmed citizens being in DC that week, plus up to 1 million armed citizens being just across the Potomac in VA.
     Absent a strike in Syria, this march could become one of the pivotal moments in American--if not WORLD history. Under the right circumstances, it would be VERY likely we hear "Hail to the Chief" played for Joe Biden.
     Unless Obama finds a suitable a distraction.
     It's not in the interests of the United States to get involved in a war that A: we have no part in and B: does not benefit us in any way.
     The only person who will benefit is Obama.